How to Cite:
Merriman, N., 2002. A Response to Michael Tite’s Paper on Archaeological Collections: Invasive Sampling versus Object Integrity. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 13, pp.6–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/pia.188
Merriman, N., 2002. A Response to Michael Tite’s Paper on Archaeological Collections: Invasive Sampling versus Object Integrity. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 13, pp.6–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/pia.188
Merriman N. A Response to Michael Tite’s Paper on Archaeological Collections: Invasive Sampling versus Object Integrity. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology. 2002;13:6–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/pia.188
Merriman, N. (2002). A Response to Michael Tite’s Paper on Archaeological Collections: Invasive Sampling versus Object Integrity. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, 13, 6–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/pia.188
Merriman N, ‘A Response to Michael Tite’s Paper on Archaeological Collections: Invasive Sampling Versus Object Integrity’ (2002) 13 Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 6 DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/pia.188
Merriman, Nick. 2002. “A Response to Michael Tite’s Paper on Archaeological Collections: Invasive Sampling Versus Object Integrity”. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 13: 6–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/pia.188
Merriman, Nick. “A Response to Michael Tite’s Paper on Archaeological Collections: Invasive Sampling Versus Object Integrity”. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology 13 (2002): 6–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/pia.188
Merriman, N.. “A Response to Michael Tite’s Paper on Archaeological Collections: Invasive Sampling Versus Object Integrity”. Papers from the Institute of Archaeology, vol. 13, 2002, pp. 6–8. DOI: http://doi.org/10.5334/pia.188
